coursemapLoading course
Department of Political and Social Change · ANU College of Asia and the Pacific
Students undertaking this course remotely may have issues accessing materials online, please contact the CAP Student Centre for more information. This graduate-level seminar course introduces students to the major debates that have animated scholarly literature on the rise, nature and breakdown of democracy. It takes participants through a series of core texts from the last fifty years concerning how democracy is best defined, how and under what conditions democratic regimes come into place and break down, and how democracy interacts with other important political and social phenomena (such as inequality and ethnicity), as well as on authoritarian alternatives to democracy. The later parts of the course focus on contemporary challenges facing democracy worldwide. Students will be expected to critically assess alternative approaches to the study of democratic regimes and breakdown, and to apply the theories they encounter through comparative analysis of historical and contemporary cases.
1. Critical Discussion
Learning outcomes 3, 4
2. Reading response papers
Learning outcomes 2, 3, 4
3. Critical Review Essay
Learning outcomes 1, 2, 4
4. Research Essay
Learning outcomes 1, 4
3-hour weekly seminar (x 12). 8 hours personal study. Extensive reading (100-250 pages per week). Regular written assignments 4/12 weeks). 2 major written assignments (2,000 words & 5,000 words).
Preliminary Reading Diamond, Larry. 2008. The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies around the World. Macmillan. Students will read extracts from all books cited. Week 1: Defining democracy, comparing regimes. • Przeworski, Adam. (1999) "Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense." In Democracy's Value, edited by Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordón, New York: Cambridge University Press. • Heller, Patrick. "Degrees of Democracy: Some Comparative Lessons from India." World Politics 52, no. 4 (2000): 484-519. • Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. • Linz, Juan J. (1975) "Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes", in N. Polsby and F. Greenstein, eds., Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3 Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley Press, pp. 175-411, 1975, Week 2: Historical development • Acemoglu, Daron & Robinson, James. (2006). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. • Moore, Barrington, Jr. (1966). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Cambridge: Beacon Press. • Stephens, John D., Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Evelyne Huber Stephens (1992) Capitalist Development and Democracy. Polity. • Luebbert, G. M. (1987). "Social foundations of political order in interwar Europe." World Politics: A Quarterly Journal of International Relations: 449-478. Week 3: Democratization • O’Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe C. Schmitter (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. • Huntington, Samuel P. (1993) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. • Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, Jose, & Limongi, Fernando. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well Being in the World, 1950- 1990. New York: Cambridge University Press. Week 4: Democratic consolidation and breakdown • Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan (1978) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. • Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. • Carothers, Thomas (2002) "The End of the Transition Paradigm", Journal of Democracy, Volume 13, Number 1, pp. 5-21. • Bermeo, Nancy G. (2003). Ordinary people in extraordinary times : the citizenry and the breakdown of democracy. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press. Week 5: Democracy and inequality • Boix, Carles. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. • Ben Ansell and David Samuels. (2014) Inequality and Democratization: An Elite-Competition Approach. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. • Various pieces in American Political Science Association, Comparative Democratization newsletter. October 2013. Week 6: Democracy and ethnicity • Lijphart, Arend (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press. • Chandra, Kanchan (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. • Posner, Daniel N (2005) Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Week 7: Democracy, governance, corruption Johnston, Michael (2005) (Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power, and Democracy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina (2015) The Quest for Good Governance. How Societies Develop Control of Corruption, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Rothstein, Bo (2011) The Quality of Government. Corruption, Social Trust and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Week 8: Clientelism and democracy Kitschelt, Herbert and Steven I. Wilkinson (2006) (eds.) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Stokes, Susan C., Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno and Valeria Brusco (2013) Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Week 9: The persistence of authoritarianism • Slater, Dan (2010). Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York, Cambridge University Press. • Gandhi, J. and A. Przeworski (2007). "Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats." Comparative Political Studies 40(11): 1279-1301. • Pepinsky, Thomas (2013). "The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism." British Journal of Political Science: 1-23. • Svolik, M. W. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. • Bueno de Mesquita, B., A. Smith, R. M. Siverson and J. D. Morrow (2005). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MIT Press. • Sassoon, J. (2016). Anatomy of authoritarianism in the Arab republics. New York, Cambridge University Press. Week 10: Electoral authoritarianism • Levitsky, Steven and Lucan A. Way (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press • Zakaria, F. (1997). "The Rise of Illiberal Democracy." Foreign Affairs 76: 22. • Schedler, Andreas (2015). Electoral Authoritarianism. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. • Brownlee, Jason (2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. • Gandhi, J. and E. Lust-Okar (2009). "Elections under authoritarianism." Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403-422. Week 11: The populist challenge • Moffitt, Benjamin (2016) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press. • Kenny, Paul (2016) Populism and Patronage: Why Populists win Elections in India, Asia, and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press. • Judis, John B. (2016). The populist explosion: how the great recession transformed American and European politics. New York, Columbia Global Reports. Week 12: Democratic regression Foa, Roberto Stefan and Yascha Mounk (2017) "The Signs of Deconsolidation", Journal of Democracy, Volume 28, Number 1, pp.5-15. Diamond, Larry (2015) "Facing up to the Democratic Recession", Journal of Democracy Volume 26, Number